Plan Authorized For $2.2 Billion Tunnel Close to Stonehenge


A general view from the A303 of Stonehenge as it remains closed to the public on May 24, 2020 in Salisbury, England.

Picture: Alex Davidson (Getty Pictures)

Stonehenge, the enduring prehistoric monument in Britain, was first given authorized safety by Parliament in 1882. The Nineteenth-century legislation was the primary time within the nation that any construction was deemed traditionally important sufficient to be protected. Now, the British authorities desires to assemble a highway tunnel close to Stonehenge regardless of the hurt that the federal government’s personal consultants consider the mission will do to the UNESCO World Heritage Web site.

The A303, the highway which runs by Stonehenge, has lengthy suffered visitors jams dozens of miles lengthy throughout the summer season vacation season. The proximity to the monument partly causes the congestion, however extra considerably, the A303 is a key route between London and the South West of England. The BBC stories that the UK’s Division for Transport has authorized a two-mile tunnel to maintain visitors out of sight of Stonehenge, scale back congestion and shorten journey occasions.

The plan may sound easy, however constructing something round a 5000-year-old archaeological website is extremely damaging. Transport Secretary Grant Shapps initially authorized the plan in 2020 with out the advice of the federal government’s Planning Inspectorate. In line with the BBC, the company said the tunnel would trigger “everlasting, irreversible hurt” to the UNESCO World Heritage website. Because of a crowd-funded native marketing campaign, a 2021 courtroom ruling deemed Shappe’s resolution illegal and was capable of freeze the mission’s progress.

On this new approval, present Transport Secretary Mark Harper admitted, “There shall be hurt on account of the event to cultural heritage and the historic surroundings.” The mission appears absurd. Is including two extra lanes going to repair visitors? In all probability not. Is it price damaging probably the most traditionally important websites on the planet? Undoubtedly not.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Read More

Recent